Kenyan Member of Parliament George Peter Kaluma has stirred intense debate with a provocative call to end male circumcision, branding it “male genital mutilation.” In a recent statement, the outspoken lawmaker challenged the cultural and religious practice, arguing that it lacks natural basis and stems from outdated beliefs tied to the biblical figure Abraham.
Kaluma’s stance is rooted in a comparison between humans and animals, noting that creatures like donkeys do not undergo circumcision. He questions why humans—specifically those claiming descent from Abraham, described as a desert-dweller without water—continue the practice. His framing of circumcision as mutilation draws parallels to criticisms of female genital mutilation, suggesting a need to rethink its ethical standing.
In Kenya, circumcision is a widespread rite of passage for many communities, symbolizing manhood and belonging. Globally, it’s practiced by millions, often for religious or health reasons, with studies linking it to reduced HIV transmission in some contexts. Kaluma’s remarks dismiss these justifications, casting the tradition as an unnecessary imposition rooted in myth rather than reason.
The MP’s statement has polarized opinions. Some Kenyans applaud his boldness, seeing it as a push for bodily autonomy and a challenge to blind adherence to tradition. Others view it as an assault on cultural identity and faith, particularly among communities where circumcision is a sacred act. Online platforms have buzzed with reactions, ranging from support for his radical perspective to accusations of disrespecting heritage.
Kaluma, known for controversial takes, may be aiming to provoke discussion rather than propose immediate policy. His words arrive in a nation where circumcision debates have historically surfaced, often tied to ethnic divides. As a public figure, his influence could amplify the conversation, potentially impacting social attitudes or even legislative agendas.
This call to action raises broader questions: Is circumcision a valuable tradition or an archaic practice? While Kaluma offers no compromise, his critique forces society to confront the tension between custom and consent. As the discourse unfolds, Kenya—and beyond—must grapple with where to draw the line in reevaluating long-held norms.